> But at the same time I cannot imagine reverting to code with no help of LLMs.

And doesn't that bother you a little?

If you listen to podcasts, check out this podcast episode: https://www.pushkin.fm/podcasts/cautionary-tales/flying-too-...

It is about Air France 447, but also draws parallels to AI and self-driving cars

▲

egorfine 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Look, every medicine is a poison as well. Every single byte of code I commit I fully understand. I am strongly against slop.

However I'm not going back to asking stackoverflow and pretend that I have nowhere else to find answers.

▲

ZenoArrow 8 minutes ago | parent [-]

> However I'm not going back to asking stackoverflow and pretend that I have nowhere else to find answers.

That's not your only option.

What you're meant to do is understand the tools you're using well enough to not need to ask for help from anyone or anything else. Stack Overflow is useful, but it's a learning tool. If all you were doing before AI was copying and modifying other people's code, it's no wonder that you have taken to AI, because it's just a slightly more convenient form of that.

	▲	egorfine 4 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		> If all you were doing before AI was copying and modifying other people's code Aren't we all in a sense?