Remix.run Logo
oofbaroomf 7 hours ago

"Prediction" markets were supposed to be great because of insiders: they make the probabilities much more accurate and actually useful for forecasting.

But they ended up just being for gamblers and there is no more signal.

YokoZar 14 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

You may be interested in "Do Morons Make Prediction Markets More Accurate?" - https://nicholasdecker.substack.com/p/do-morons-make-predict...

Essentially the argument is that more dumb money in a prediction market provides an even stronger incentive for smart money to join, moving the price back to an accurate probability.

tototrains 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I regularly check geopolitical markets to see if a breaking news story is substantial or not, and find it useful. It can help distinguish between propaganda and intelligence there.

It does seem like there could be a distinction between markets which require genuinely knowledge and analysis (geopolitics), versus pure gambling (sports, crypto up/down 5 minutes, etc), but I'm not sure who's going to bother making it.

William_BB 2 hours ago | parent [-]

(Geopolitical) prediction markets almost always tend to overreact. This is expected from retail, so I'm not sure about the signal.

echoangle an hour ago | parent [-]

So why not just always bet against their reaction? Over time you should make money then, right?