| ▲ | oofbaroomf 7 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
"Prediction" markets were supposed to be great because of insiders: they make the probabilities much more accurate and actually useful for forecasting. But they ended up just being for gamblers and there is no more signal. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | YokoZar 14 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
You may be interested in "Do Morons Make Prediction Markets More Accurate?" - https://nicholasdecker.substack.com/p/do-morons-make-predict... Essentially the argument is that more dumb money in a prediction market provides an even stronger incentive for smart money to join, moving the price back to an accurate probability. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tototrains 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I regularly check geopolitical markets to see if a breaking news story is substantial or not, and find it useful. It can help distinguish between propaganda and intelligence there. It does seem like there could be a distinction between markets which require genuinely knowledge and analysis (geopolitics), versus pure gambling (sports, crypto up/down 5 minutes, etc), but I'm not sure who's going to bother making it. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||