Precisely

Anthropic never explains they are fear-mongering for the incoming mass scale job loss while being the one who is at the full front rushing to realize it.

So make no mistake: it is absolutely a zero sum game between you and Anthropic.

To people like Dario, the elimination of the programmer job, isn’t something to worry, it is a cruel marketing ploy.

They get so much money from Saudi and other gulf countries, maybe this is taking authoritarian money as charity to enrich democracy, you never know

▲

supern0va an hour ago | parent [-]

>Anthropic never explains they are fear-mongering for the incoming mass scale job loss while being the one who is at the full front rushing to realize it.

Couldn't it also be true that they see this as inevitable, but want to be the ones to steer us to it safely?

▲

karmasimida 23 minutes ago | parent [-]

Safely in what way? If you ask them to stop, the easy argument is Chinese won’t stop, so they won’t stop.

Essentially they will not stop at all, because even they know no one can stop the competition from happening.

So they ask more control in the name of safety while eliminating millions of jobs in span of a few years.

If I have to ask, how come a biggest risk of potential collapse of our ecosystem being trusted as the one to do it safely? They will do it anyway, and blame capitalism for it

	▲	wredcoll 15 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I'm not hearing an alternative here.