The government has a responsibility to protect its constituents. Sometimes that requires collaboration. This isn’t hard.

epistasis 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Is this one of those times? Seems pretty clear it's not.

The third amendment is there for a reason. I am a third amendment absolutist and willing to put my life on the line to defend it.

I wonder what you can't justify this way.

	▲	no-dr-onboard 37 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		That’s a good question. Assuming a righteous and just government: The government couldn’t justify the killing of innocent civilians. The government couldn’t justify the killing of the unborn. The government couldn’t justify eugenics. There are objective moral absolutes.