Am i the only one who understands the deparments position? Like if another country will have it without safeguards, why would I not want it without safeguards. I can still be the safeguard, but having safeguards enforced by another entity that potentially has to face negative financial consequences seems like a disadvantage, would be weird to accept that as department of war.

I understand the risk, but that is the pill.

they could use a different provider for the kill chain.

we must use claude to decide whether to nuke iran, or else our gun manufacturers arent allowed to use to to run spreadsheets

is a bit ridiculous.