| ▲ | zahlman 5 hours ago |
| At the time, the users were the programmers. |
|
| ▲ | amelius 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| This is misleading because you use plural for both and I'm sure most of these UX missteps were _each_ made by a _single_ person, and there were >1 users even at the time. |
| |
| ▲ | Msurrow 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think he meant that at that time all users were programmers. Yes, _all_ . | | |
| ▲ | zahlman 42 minutes ago | parent [-] | | It was a bit of an over-generalization, but yes that's basically what I was going for. |
| |
| ▲ | ifh-hn 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > and there were >1 users even at the time. Are you sure there wasn't >&1 users... Sorry I'll get my coat. | |
| ▲ | andoando 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | programmers are people too! bash syntax just sucks |
|
|
| ▲ | booi 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| arguably if you're using the CLI they still are |
| |
| ▲ | spiralcoaster 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yeah but now they're using npm to install a million packages to do things like tell if a number is greater than 10000. The chances of the programmer wanting to understand the underlying system they are using is essentially nil. | |
| ▲ | spott 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yea, they are just much higher level programmers… most programmers don’t know the low level syscall apis. | |
| ▲ | kube-system 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | nah, we have long had other disciplines using the CLI who do not write their own software, e.g. sysadmins |
|