| ▲ | simianwords 5 hours ago |
| i don't think this is true. assuming $150,000 average salary thats around $600,000 totally so that increases the yearly profit by about 30%. |
|
| ▲ | boredatoms 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| While destroying morale, and increasing the difficulty of successfully recruiting later |
|
| ▲ | overfeed 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I directly quoted jack - take it up with him. |
| |
| ▲ | simianwords 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | > The company is profitable, and Jack could have kept 4000 people employed with no difference in outcome did he suggest no difference in outcome in terms of profits? | | |
| ▲ | overfeed 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | You can check for yourself, if you RTFA. Everything I said was based off of jack's post, as I quoted it. If you take issue with the non-specificity ot think he was being less than honest - take it up with jack. | | |
| ▲ | simianwords 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | i don't think you understood what i'm saying nor what he's saying. you don't do a layoff without accepting a change in the outcome. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | just-the-wrk 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| they are now estimating 18% instead of 17% |
