| ▲ | ck2 5 hours ago | |
BTW with self-driving cars, what happens when there are hundreds of Lidar signals at one intersection? There's no way a sensor can tell if a signal was from its own origin? Guessing any signal should be treated as untrusted until verified somehow but I suspect coders won't be doing that unless it's easy | ||
| ▲ | retrac 29 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
> There's no way a sensor can tell if a signal was from its own origin? https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978ntc.....2...18F/abstra... https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA218226.pdf > An increasingly popular modulation scheme is Binary Pseudo Random Phase Coding (BPRPC), whereby the phase of the transmitted signal is switched between 0 and 180 under the control of a binary pseudo random sequence this applies straightforwardly to lidar basically: optical CDMA or DSSS spoofing replay may still be a concern | ||
| ▲ | r2_pilot 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Typically you use a pulse train and filter your train from the noise | ||
| ▲ | jowday 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Worked adjacent to the AV space 5~ years ago. This wasn’t my area but I remember learning that this was a robustly solved problem long ago. | ||
| ▲ | Rarebox 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
If one lidar hits another, it will result in at most one bad reading (perhaps a bad column?). This can likely be filtered, or a bad scan (360deg) can be altogether rejected and the data predicted using models based on past sensor readings. | ||
| ▲ | MengerSponge 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I guess phase and timing sensitivity help a lot, because it's unlikely that another emitter will perfectly match your emission/detection duty cycle. It's also hard to get hundreds of cars at one intersection, because cars are very big. The key terms in your literature/patent search should probably be "Crosstalk" and "multi-LIDaR". | ||