| ▲ | WA 4 hours ago | |||||||
Not sure what to make of this. React is missing entirely. Or is this report also assuming that React is the default for everything and not worth mentioning at all? Just like shadcn/ui's first mention of React is somewhere down the page or hidden in the docs? Furthermore, what's the point of "no tools named"? Why would I restrict myself like that? If I put "use Nodejs, Hono, TypeScript and use Hono's html helper to generate HTML on the server like its 2010, write custom CSS, minimize client-side JS, no Tailwind" in CLAUDE.md, it happily follows this. | ||||||||
| ▲ | godtoldmetodoit 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
As someone who runs a small dev agency, I'm very interested in research like this. Let's say some Doctor decides to vibecode an app on the weekend, with next to 0 exposure to software development until she started hearing about how easy it was to create software with these tools. She makes incredible progress and is delighted in how well it works, but as she considers actually opening it up the world she keeps running into issues. How do I know this is secure? How do I keep this maintained and running? I want to be in a position where she can find me to get professional help, so it's very helpful to know what stacks these kinds of apps are being built in. | ||||||||
| ▲ | chasd00 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
claudecode _loves_ shadcn/ui. I hadn't even heard of it until i was playing around with claudecode. It seems fine to me and if the coding agent loves it then more power to it, i don't really care. That's the problem. I think that makes coding agent choices extremely suspect, like i don't really care what it uses as long as what's produced works and functions inline with my expectations. I can totally see companies paying Anthropic to promote their tool of choice to the top of claudecodes preferences. After thinking about it, i'm not sure if that's a problem or not. I don't really care what it uses as long as my requirements (all of them) are met. | ||||||||
| ▲ | skywhopper 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Because the primary and future audience of Claude et al don’t know the tools they want, or even that a choice exists. | ||||||||
| ▲ | furyofantares 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> Furthermore, what's the point of "no tools named"? There are vibe coders out there that don't know anything about coding. | ||||||||
| ||||||||