| ▲ | jeremysalwen 2 hours ago | |
I'm suspicious of the theorem proving example. I thought Z3 could fail to return sat or unsat, but he is assuming that if it's not sat the theorem must be proven | ||
| ▲ | ymherklotz an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
No I think it's fine. On another note, I have proven Fermat's Last Theorem with z3 using this setup :) and it goes faster if you reduce a variable called "timeout" for some reason! | ||
| ▲ | hwayne an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
...Whoops. Yup, SMT solvers can famously return `unknown` on top of `sat` and `unsat`. Just added a post addendum about the mistake. | ||