Remix.run Logo
loeg 4 hours ago

You can't just throw revenue in the denominator, though. Business tax is assessed on income. If you're going to make a claim about tax rate using an unconventional metric, you need to be explicit about what you've done; Reich isn't.

gojomo 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If you're Robert Reich, you can! You can make up anything, and someone will submit it to HN to waste everyone's time!

Refreeze5224 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yeah, screw Robert Reich! Always looking out for the workers who make up the majority of this country. Why won't he look out for the poor multi-national corporations, who have no one to advocate for them or their tax rates?

loeg 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Hey, he can advocate for whatever causes he likes. I just think honesty makes a more compelling argument than lies.

thunky 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> Always looking out for the workers

How is spreading misinformation looking out for the workers?

MichaelZuo 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I thought there were systems designed to effectively negate users that submit too many misleading posts.

latexr 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Your parent post isn’t suggesting it’s always the same user submitting, just that users submit a lot of posts from this person.

Can’t say I agree, though. I don’t recall ever having seen one of his posts on HN, and a cursory search suggests they’re not even upvoted that much. Highest I found was under 30 points. But my methodology is flawed, as I basically searched for the name.

TrainedMonkey 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sure, and there are a ton of ways to shifting income around. For example selling a subsidiary in lower tax jurisdiction patents and then paying for their usage. Another example is Hollywood accounting where productions pay exorbitant rates for equipment and catering to affiliated companies. This inflates the costs so the movies end up unprofitable despite smashing box office.

quietbritishjim 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Business tax is assessed on income.

Income (in a business) is another word for revenue. I think you meant: business tax is assessed on profit.

Maxatar 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

In the U.S. income is defined as revenue minus expenses:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_(United_States_legal_de...

loeg 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

No, my usage was correct and unambiguous. Describing income as revenue is incorrect. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/122214/what-differe...

beezle 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This is incorrect as anyone who has looked at a financial statement or taken a first level accounting class will know - Revenue is the top line, the gross income and lastly net income, the two reflecting the removal of various costs/expenses as per GAAP.

shevis 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Income != profit. Income is revenue. It sure would be nice if businesses were taxed on income, given that’s how people are taxed and all. Aren’t corporations supposedly people now thanks to citizens united?

loeg 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You're mistaken. Income is net of expenses. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/122214/what-differe...

pinkmuffinere 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I appreciate your polite corrections with well sourced info! Being a bit silly, I’ll say you’re a shiny beam of knowledge in a dark expanse of confusion

3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]