| ▲ | reliabilityguy 15 hours ago |
| > Why not ship your externality creating activities elsewhere? Like where? |
|
| ▲ | runjake 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Like the places where people welcome deregulation and jobs? Not trying to sound like a jerk but there’s plenty of places in the US where people welcome stuff like coal mines and polluting factories. If the factories have to be somewhere and they consent, then why not there? |
| |
| ▲ | culi 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | corporations taking hold of small local governments and passing laws that benefit them, unbeknownst to the locals living there, is hardly "consent" | |
| ▲ | tolerance 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Can’t help but feel like you’re overestimating the competency of the average voter in these effected areas; a breath after yours—though not necessarily your own—may condemn these people for being undereducated, out of touch with culture or subject to corporate grifters. | |
| ▲ | 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | anon-3988 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There's this country called China that you guys been offshoring manufacturing to... |
| |
|
| ▲ | tokenless 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Well the attitude that puts a full stop (well a question mark) after "NIMBY" says implicity "where the poors live". |
| |
| ▲ | reliabilityguy 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | Well, I find it a bit hypocritical: if those things are so bad, why to forbid manufacturing and not consumption? Otherwise you just pollute a place where people that have no say live. |
|