Shouldn't you be able to answer that?

yes and if you clicked the links you would know that i did answer it in the readme.

	▲	ctmnt 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I read the README and did not find answers to my questions.
	▲	mathfailure 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		But how do we know the readme isn't also vibecoded?
	▲	do_not_redeem 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> Pure-Go tree-sitter runtime — no CGo, no C toolchain, WASM-ready. No you didn't. The readme is obvious LLM slop. Em-dash, rule of three, "not x, y". Why should anyone spend effort reading something you couldn't be bothered to write? Why did you post it to HN from a burner account?