> discounting the overhead

Are you moving the goalpost?

The whole thing is a bit unfair anyway. My perplexity is trained on me. It knows that I have python installed, thus it wouldn't tell me that I would need to do so. It knows I'm a programmer, it knows that I value accuracy and precision. It knows to double-check everything all by itself.

I am confident in claiming that it can get the task done regardless of the above, but its response, as is, cannot be generalized.

▲

javascriptfan69 4 hours ago | parent [-]

>Are you moving the goalpost?

I mean you did originally claim that this was something that was "for the masses" and then posted a solution that only someone technical could actually use.

Not that I doubt it couldn't one shot something this simple with a .exe wrapper.

	▲	5o1ecist an hour ago \| parent [-]
		> and then posted a solution that only someone technical could actually use. What do you mean by that? I don't understand. I really don't think this requires someone "technical" anymore. ChatGPT might not give a python script, but a powershell script. Or possibly create a batch file. Generally, since the default assumption is that the user is a moron, it chooses the path of least resistance, meaning that it all boils to the user being able to process written words and following instructions. Nowadays, it seems to me that the real hurdle is the fact that far too many people can't properly read, write or express themselves anymore, let alone ask questions that might expose ... inadequacies.