| ▲ | Avamander 3 hours ago | |
I'm fairly sure that Safe Browsing's false-positive rate is extremely low otherwise it'd be unusable in Chrome. Which also means that acting on positive results is very likely a correct approach. | ||
| ▲ | NewJazz 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Safe browsing is meant for websites, not domain names. You really want your registry acting on it and nuking your email services, intranet services, cert renewal automation, et cetera? | ||