| ▲ | cgriswald 5 hours ago | |
A poster commented that he read parenthetical remarks in an old-timey voice (I’d guess the trans-Atlantic accent). I love that idea. But for me they read almost as if you’re saying them under your breath (or a character is breaking the fourth wall and talking to the camera quietly). I read them but my brain assigns them less importance. Em-dashes keep everything on the same level of importance in my brain. Commas don’t feel as powerful. To be fair to the comma I’d probably do this: Em-dash matches how I speak and think: A halt, then push onto the digression stack, then pop. So I use them like that. Edit: I accidentally used an em-dash in the word em-dash. Interestingly HN didn’t consider changing the dash to be a change in my text so didn’t update it. I had to make a separate change and take that change out for my dash change to stick. | ||
| ▲ | basch 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |
For me, a sequence of sentences, strung together by commas, is more in line with how I output thought, and better matches what I believe my speech pattern is. | ||