How is it any more of an opinion to "mark" a website as "unsafe" than say, "contains CSAM"?

dspillett 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

“contains CSAM” is likely an unarguable fact.

“unsafe” is a term that is both broader and more vague, so I would consider it opinion unless backed up by appropriate facts (like “contains CSAM”, “contains malware”, and so forth).

	▲	kmoser 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> “contains CSAM” is likely an unarguable fact. Except when it isn't. CSAM may be easier to define and identify than pornography, but there still exists material that treads a moral grey area.

▲

otterley 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

One is disprovable, the other is not.