| ▲ | iamnothere 8 hours ago | |||||||||||||
The registrar relying on Google Safe Browsing as a “trigger” for suspension is the most horrifying thing I’ve seen in a while. This basically makes the entire TLD unviable for serious use. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mzajc 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
.online is one of the many TLDs that charge a dollar for registration but bump the price to $30-$35 for renewal. So far, this seems like a good signal to tell apart serious TLDs and ones just preying on customers who sort by cheapest (or capitalizing on one-off phishing domains). | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | RHSeeger 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
The followup from that would appear to be don't use any domain that Radix controls. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mcoliver 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
This is the real story. This is 100% a problem with Radix. Safe browsing targets the website not the domain. No reason a registrar should be suspending an entire account over something a company reports. Black-holing the A and CNAMEs on a subdomain? Maybe..... But even then I don't think it's the registrars place to do that. Freezing the entire account? Absolutely not. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | WmWsjA6B29B4nfk 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Who said serious use is their business model though. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | NewJazz 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Registry, not registrar | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||