Have you not heard of a little organ called brain that can be used to understand what you read? There is even a link to the latest quarterly report there (have you heard of links and financial reports?).

▲

raw_anon_1111 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Well considering over the course of four years I got around a quarter million of AMZN (and sold it as soon as it vested)…

And if you actually read the report you would see where he is still wrong.

Hint: there is more to “North America” than just the US.

▲

kgwgk 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> Well considering

That makes your comment even worse!

> if you actually read the report you would see where he is still wrong

“about $3000 for every household in America.”

Please let us know what alternative number did you get after your careful reading of the report.

▲

raw_anon_1111 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Well since the lawsuit only considers the US and the revenue reported is for “North America”. I’ll let you figure that out.

▲

kgwgk 2 hours ago | parent [-]

No, please tell me how do you get a result which is not about $3000 per US household. I’m really curious!

▲

raw_anon_1111 2 hours ago | parent [-]

North American revenue includes US, Mexico and Canada. The lawsuit is only about US households.

Also, while technically correct that what is included in “how much people in North America spend at Amazon”. The lawsuit is about online sales. Whole Foods by itself made $150 billion in revenue which comes under North American sales.

	▲	kgwgk 36 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		> The lawsuit is only about US households. Still waiting for the estimate of dollars per US household which is not about $3000. Come on, you can at least try to get to $2800 and claim victory! > Whole Foods by itself made $150 billion in revenue. That seems wrong by an order of magnitude. Or maybe you mean in a decade?