Remix clone Hacker News

new | show | ask | jobs Github

	▲	UqWBcuFx6NV4r 2 hours ago
		The fact that this is even being discussed is truly a bad smell of bad-faith “dig up anything that sounds bad” “reporting”
	▲	tharkun__ 12 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Yeah I'd sorta second that actually. I can't "judge" on everything they say in the blog post. But some things I definitely recognize as "bad-faith". `Datadog RUM (browser-intake-datadoghq.com) - real-time user monitoring. every click, every page load - on a FedRAMP platform processing PII and biometrics.` Well duh, yes, DataDog does have those capabilities. Doesn't mean you use all of it, just coz you use RUM in general. We also use DataDog and RUM. But we also use filtering, including filtering out the known PII sources we have in our specific case (non-FedRAMP) and we don't have entire session recording enabled for example and we only sample. Yet no mention of that in the post. They just assume that they must be sending PII from a FedRAMP site to DataDog. No proof of what data actually does get sent.