| |
| ▲ | orf 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | So we shouldn’t mark anything as unsafe then? And give no indication whatsoever? The issue isn’t that the word “safe” doesn’t appear in safe variants, it’s that “unsafe” makes your intentions clear: “I know this is unsafe, but it’s fine because of X and Y”. | | |
| ▲ | croes 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Maybe we should add the word safe and consider everything else as unsafe | | |
| ▲ | orf 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Like life, things should default to being safe. Unsafe, unexpected behaviours should be exception and thus require an exceptional name. Legacy and backwards compatibility hampers this, but going forward… |
|
|
|
