| ▲ | xhkkffbf 9 hours ago | |
I think it's a bad trend. It's kind of a meta version of an ad hominem attack. The headline contained no information about why Discord is making the decision, only that there's a bad name associated with the company. The name of the company isn't even mentioned in the headline. This is prioritizing hate over information. | ||
| ▲ | mullingitover 9 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Having the name associated with the company says a lot, actually. The man is the Forrest Gump of backing creepy companies. | ||