There is more than “unique web design” that cause reading issues with that article. For one the lowercase and as well as arcane keywords and organization. Not mention the autoplay music. I have communicated this to the author and they shrugged it off.

▲

BoredPositron 9 hours ago | parent [-]

>> Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting.

	▲	dgxyz 9 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It's all of those, many more and does the content injustice. Don't talk about the bad things does no one any good.
	▲	righthand 9 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Yes most of us have read the rule. And I wasnt complaining in my comment I was directing the author as to why their submission was getting complaints and flagged. Stomping your feet that it doesn’t matter when people are telling your article is slightly unreadable really doesn’t make you or your article worthwhile to invest time in. No matter how good it is. Have a quirky website fine, but if you have important information you want to be taken seriously for, maybe consolidate that information into a more accessible format. Otherwise people will tell you AND do otherwise.