| ▲ | KeplerBoy 3 hours ago | |||||||
Not a fan. The standard schematic abstraction is great and actually helps us parse circuits. Don't add unnecessary complexity just because AIs are good at vibecoding threejs demos (edit: even if this particular demo seems to predate vibecoding and was likely used for training instead of being the product of inference). | ||||||||
| ▲ | asystole 33 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
So we're just using "vibe coded" as a generic insult now for project we don't like? | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | icedrift an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
On the contrary, when I was in high school we had one class dedicated to digital electronics and it revolved around breadboard circuitry. You only had 30 minutes/day to tinker with the physical hardware then it had to be disassembled for the next class. Simulations like this are more approachable then schematics and would have been great for tinkering outside of class. | ||||||||
| ▲ | colesantiago an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
This is actually very cool and predates vibe coding, please stop gatekeeping. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | globular-toast 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Got to agree. This is kind of pointless. Breadboards exist to make it easier to build physical circuits. I would also argue there is paedagogical value in actually playing with a physical breadboard. Having to physically orient things in 3D space is a small price you pay for building a physical prototype. This is all the downsides with none of the upsides. | ||||||||