| ▲ | matthewfcarlson 6 hours ago | |||||||
I know this is me coming from my spoiled perspective of Linux and macOS, but the advice of running a VM that manages the WiFi hardware and passing it back to the OS seems insane to me | ||||||||
| ▲ | josephg 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
If an OS is designed to do this from the ground up, it can be incredibly efficient. (See: SeL4). Each process on linux is essentially its own isolated virtual machine already. Linux processes just have all sorts of ambient authority - for example, to access the filesystem and network on behalf of the user which started the process. Restricting what a process can do (sandboxing it) shouldn't have any bearing on performance. | ||||||||
| ▲ | Firerouge 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Qubes OS is the Linux version of this concept. Hardware and their drivers get VMs for security boundary isolation. | ||||||||
| ▲ | hoherd 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
In my experience, AI is really good at creating bloatware, which makes it doubly frustrating that it is eating up all the RAM. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | skydhash 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Computers are so complicated right now that they're literally a network of computers. When you consider the closed firmware issue, using a VM is like having a small router you connect with ethernet. And I believe you could run such VM with 64MB of RAM. | ||||||||
| ▲ | bandrami 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Architecturally it makes a kind of sense given the way firmware operates (a lot of your peripherals are mini-computers inside your computer) | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
| [deleted] | ||||||||
| ▲ | secbear 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
seems pretty solid from a security perspective actually | ||||||||
| ▲ | raverbashing 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Honestly it's not spoiled to want to use the hardware you paid for | ||||||||