| ▲ | lorenzohess 2 hours ago | |
Looks great for a prototype. Has any modeling, simulation, or analysis been done of its off-road performance, i.e. mobility, GO/NOGO, motive efficiency, maneuverability on deformable terrain? This is critical for agricultural applications. Has any stress analysis been done on the frame? Looks to me like it could use a couple more triangles to reinforce those rectangles. Have you designed a skid-steering controller for it? Off-road skid steering can be quite variable obviously depending on terrain properties. | ||
| ▲ | Sabrees an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
Rosys (a middleware layer https://github.com/zauberzeug/rosys) has rosys.driving.Odometer and rosys.driving.Steerer it's essentially a differential drive kinematic model. Hoping RTK dual-F9P moving-base setup (M4 in the roadmap) largely sidesteps the worst of this — NAV-RELPOSNED gives us a real heading vector independent of wheel odometry, and the robot_localisation EKF can weight RTK heavily and odometry lightly when GNSS quality is good. | ||
| ▲ | Sabrees an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
The current simulation is underdeveloped but can be found here https://github.com/samuk/caatingarobotics/tree/jazzy/src/agr... The frame will almost certainly need more triangles | ||