Remix.run Logo
roysting 3 hours ago

You are unfortunately, for whatever your reasons you have, barking up the wrong tree. The people already made a law, the supreme law in fact, called the Constitution.

In fact the capital criminals in this matter are the people violating and betraying that supreme law; the politicians, sheriffs, city councils, and even the YC funders behind Flock, etc.

It is in fact not even just violating the supreme law, but though that betrayal, it is in fact also treason.

bezier-curve 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Where in the Constitution does it require us to give up our privacy to private companies with little oversight? Seems like there's contention here.

https://journals.law.unc.edu/ncjolt/blogs/under-surveillance...

margalabargala 3 hours ago | parent [-]

The person you replied to is saying usage Flock is violating the constitution.

bezier-curve 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I was confused by the "barking up the wrong tree" opener because the parent commenter was not contradicting that line of thinking either. Though destroying property is not going to get anyone anywhere, that I can agree with if that's GP's point.

ranger_danger an hour ago | parent [-]

> destroying property is not going to get anyone anywhere

I seem to remember something about tea in Boston having a different outcome.