It’s common sense to ask a question in riddle format? What’s the goal of the person asking the question? To challenge the other person? In what way? See if they get the obvious? Asking for clarification isn’t valid?

▲

streetfighter64 3 hours ago | parent [-]

It's common sense to know that you need to have your car with you to wash it. Asking the question is a challenge in the obvious yes. If you asked an AI "what's 2+2" and it said 3, would you argue that the question was a trick question?

▲

hmokiguess 3 hours ago | parent [-]

No. I would expect it to say 4 given that has an objective answer. For the other, without any context whatsoever, I would prefer the answer of clarifying. I would be okay if the way it asked for clarification came with:

“What do you mean walk or drive? I don’t understand the options given you would need your car at the car wash. Is there something else I should know?”

▲

streetfighter64 3 hours ago | parent [-]

"What do you mean two plus two? I don't understand the question given that it's basic math. Is there something else I should know?"

	▲	hmokiguess 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I fail to see how these things are one and the same. I get the point you are making, I just don't agree with it. 2+2 is a complete expression, the other is grammatically correct but logically flawed. Where is the logical fallacy in 2+2?