| ▲ | BurningFrog 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||
The even firster part "vi" means "we" though. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | DrewADesign 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
And vi was an outgrowth of ex, which was an improved version of ed, which in my experience, roughly translates to ‘ugh’. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | runarberg 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I don’t think -kingur is a suffix in old norse. It is not a suffix in modern Icelandic, and I can’t think of any suffix like that. In fact I don‘t remember a suffix which attaches to a pronoun. In modern Icelandic at least we like to introduce more pronouns or conjugate them rather then to suffix or prefix them. If the word was broken as vi-kingur, I think the modern Icelandic would be við-kingur (or við-lingur), which is simply not a word in the language. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | b3nt-fiber 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
webay hmm. they started a trend | ||||||||||||||