| ▲ | embedding-shape 6 hours ago | |
Slightly unrelated, but you take what (hn item) you can get: What is the smallest lisp (semantically/language-wise) people know, that could be used for implementing itself? Theoretical or practical/"real" is less relevant, mostly just curious. So far, it seems Bel (by pg) might get the closest, but can't claim to be an expert, surely could be something smaller out there? | ||
| ▲ | pmcgoron 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Would SectorLISP (https://justine.lol/sectorlisp2/) count? It can run the LISP 1.5 metacircular evaluator. | ||
| ▲ | soegaard 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
This is pretty small. http://scheme.dk/blog/2006/12/self-evaluating-evaluator.html | ||
| ▲ | aportnoy 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Is Bel a smaller LISP than what's described in The Roots of Lisp? [1] | ||
| ▲ | anthk 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Check Zenlisp and Kilo Lisp under http://t3x.org Not the smallest, but a great example on how a Lisp can be reimplemented. | ||
| ▲ | naasking 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Boot sector lisp? | ||