> it doesn't seem that far fetched for me that people reach similar conclusions.

How do you suppose it is that millions of people, separated by vast geographic distances, somehow all reach similar conclusions all at once?

Related: How do you suppose it is that out of 350-700+ million people (depending on whose numbers you believe), there's always only two "choices" and both of them suck?

▲

fyredge 6 hours ago | parent [-]

In the same way that they came up with the idea of divine being(s) in the image of man that rule nature.

In the same way that patriarchy rose amongst them all.

In the same way that a shared currency was deemed necessary.

Escpecially in matters of governance, there is something to be said about how humans like to organise themselves. No country has truly escaped capitalism so far.

	▲	klsdjfdlkfjsd 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You noticed the facts, but completely failed to understand how the facts came to be. > In the same way that they came up with the idea of divine being(s) in the image of man that rule nature. Thanks to the diligent efforts of the Priesthood, of course, who never cease in their 'education' of humanity as to the 'truth.' Before the world came under centralized control of the Priesthood, there were many tribes of 'Nephelim'--or no-faith-God-people. (ne-phe-el-im.) (Nope, it has nothing to do with aliens. Guess who is telling that lie also?) > In the same way that patriarchy rose amongst them all. Not among my ancestors the Cherokee. They were a matriarchy. They were wiped out (genocided) by foreigners who were controlled by a paternal Priesthood. In our own history, we were once ruled by such a priesthood. They were called the Nicotani, or Ani-Kutani. They grew insolent and arrogant and eventually crossed the line when one of them raped a man's wife. They were subsequently exterminated, to the last man. > In the same way that a shared currency was deemed necessary. By whom? Who made that decision for you? Is it you who is deciding to get rid of cash and make everything digital too, so that you can be even more easily tracked, controlled, monitored...enslaved? > Escpecially in matters of governance, there is something to be said about how humans like to organise themselves. That's just the thing. It's not you organizing yourself.