There are also objective measures for more fine position evaluation.

For winning/drawn positions: "What is the smallest program that can guarantee your side to win/draw" probably adding some time constraint.

▲

jmount 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That is a neat variation.

▲

paulddraper 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Measuring the size of a model that produces a win?

Theoretically valid, but that's not going to be a very useful/diable.

	▲	kuboble 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		No, but in practice centipawns reported by the imperfect engine are good. But I want to point out that in theory there is also something more than pure win/ lose/ draw with prefect play.

▲

im3w1l 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think program size is probably not a good measure since any heuristic you can put in could be discovered at runtime with a metaheuristic that searches for good heuristics. Time and memory make more sense.