|
| ▲ | WarmWash 21 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| While you are technically correct, you are neglecting that it would a be a bad idea, because in such a market I would likely answer the door with a shotgun or I would have an agreement with my other neighbor to shoot you if you come to my door brandishing. This is actually also how global diplomacy works. Either have big guns or big friends. |
|
| ▲ | AlecSchueler 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If you're relying on threats of violence to make your trades then you've become the regulator. |
|
| ▲ | Xunjin 21 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think you have gone in the end of the spectrum, in a sense that even a state law's are being broken, we are talking about rules in the market itself. |
|
| ▲ | SR2Z 21 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| An unrelated market is an oxymoron. You could come to my house and put a gun to my head, but that's not a consensual trade. That's just thuggery; the point of a market is that both sides benefit from trade. For markets to exist, property rights also need to be respected. |
| |
| ▲ | nutjob2 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | The gun was an analogy and the comment satire, but the thuggery is real and the weapon is money. For markets to exist they indeed need to be regulated and when they aren't you get something other than a market, you get thuggery. |
|
|
| ▲ | shmeeed 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Username checks out Edit: upvoted because it's true |
