I know, but the density of the data is much less in human case.

IOW, humans still learn more effectively with less information, because there are innate mechanisms which process this data continuously and extract new meanings from the same data. This is part of both intelligence and consciousness.

LLMs lack both.

> I know, but the density of the data is much less in human case.

Is that really the case? How much data is it for 4k video, high bitrate auditory, spacial mapping, internal and external nervous system, emotions, and a dataset to correlate all of these in time?

> humans still learn more effectively with less information

> because there are innate mechanisms which process this data continuously and extract new meanings from the same data

To me, these statements strongly contradict each other, but I also really do not care enough to debate it.