| ▲ | throwaway2037 10 hours ago | |
Two things: (1) I see that you are using a throwaway/new account. If throwaway, I have little sympathy for any downvotes that you get. If new, welcome to the community. I hope your share you personal experiences. (2) Nothing gets me more angry than telling highly skilled people it is a "problem between keyboard and chair." ("Oh, you just need to use it correctly.") As a top secret C++ fanboi for more than 25 years, I am just so tired of hearing this bullshit. As much as it hurts me to say it, Rust is better at FORCING programmers to do the right thing... instead of C++ where you CAN do the right thing. In my mind, without a very fast iteration for C++ "dialects" (see the Google project) where teams can trivially enable or disable language features (like multiple inheritance), C++ is a dying language compared to Rust. | ||
| ▲ | riku_iki 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |
> C++ is a dying language compared to Rust. there is a good chance Rust will start dying and will actually die by being replaced by some new hyper-overengineered lang much faster than C++ actually die. | ||