| ▲ | nlitened 2 hours ago | |||||||
Cameras are cheap, but, as I understand: 1) it's not cheap to produce lidars at a stable predictable quality in millions; 2) car driving training data sets for lidars are much scarcer (and will always be much scarcer due to cameras' higher prevalence) and at a much lower quality; 3) combined camera+lidar data sets are even scarcer. | ||||||||
| ▲ | afavour an hour ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Doesn’t that make it a sensible long term play to equip your car with $200 LIDAR and start gathering that data as a competitive advantage? | ||||||||
| ||||||||