| ▲ | throwaway2037 10 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Fair point. What does Ladybird need to achieve in your opinion to shake the "hype" label? Honestly, I, myself, don't have a good answer! | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | thrdbndndn 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
To me, a project's "hype-ness" is the ratio of how much attention it gets over how useful it actually is to users. As a browser, Ladybird usefulness is currently quite limited for obvious reasons. This is not meant to dismiss its achievements, nor to overlook the fact that building a truly useful browser for everyday users is something few open source teams can accomplish without the backing of a billion dollar company. Still, in its present state, its practical utility remains limited. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pelagicAustral 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> What does Ladybird need to achieve in your opinion to shake the "hype" label? A release (?) | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||