| ▲ | keyKeeper 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There are laser measurers sold for a few buck on Temu. Robot vacuums sold for few hundred dollars have Lidars that map out the room in a seconds. Is there any actual technical reason why automobile Lidar be expensive? Just combine visual processing with single point sampler that will feed points of interest and accurate model of the surroundings will be built. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | numpad0 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Most spinning robovac LIDARs are 2D. Most solid state robovac LIDARs are like 8x8 array of laser pointers. Automotive LIDARs are like, 128x64[px] for production models or 1920x1080[px] for experimental models with GbE and/or HDMI-equivalents-of-industry outputs. Totally different technologies. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | echoangle 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Probably one factor is range. The article talks about 200-300m range, a robot vacuum has maybe 10m best case? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | qznc 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I know that automotive parts of the standard requirement to withstand 80°C (or 120°C for military use). A robot vacuum working in a living room can probably be made cheaper because it does not have to face as harsh environments? Also, range is probably a factor. In a living room, you probably need something like 20m max. You car should "see" farther. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | xavortm 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
to add to the rest of the comments, a reliability standard also adds on cost. The scale is different, but compare a car bolt vs manned space mission craft's bolt. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||