| ▲ | small_model 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Like Waymo? (https://dmnews.co.uk/waymo-robotaxi-spotted-unable-to-cross-...) 17 years after betting the farm on LIDAR the solution fails to navigate a puddle. Sorry but they bet on the wrong technology, Tesla has overtaken them with multi camera and NN solution. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cheema33 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Tesla has overtaken them with multi camera and NN solution. Let me guess, you heard this from Elon? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | UltraSane 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Your conclusion from a single incident is a bad inference. One vehicle getting confused by a puddle (likely a sensor fusion edge case or mapping artifact, not a fundamental LIDAR failure) doesn't indict the technology. Tesla's cameras have produces vastly more failures. Waymo has driven tens of millions of autonomous miles with a serious injury/fatality rate dramatically lower than human drivers. The actual data shows the technology works. Tesla FSD still requires active driver supervision and is not legally or technically a robotaxi system. Comparing them as if they're at parity is wrong. LIDAR gives direct metric depth with no inference required. Camera-only systems must infer depth from 2D images using neural networks, which introduces failure modes LIDAR doesn't have. Radar is very valuable when LIDAR and cameras give ambiguous data. What metrics has Telsa overtaken Waymo? Deployed robotaxi revenue miles? No. Disengagement rates? No published comparable data. Safety per mile in driverless operation? No. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||