| ▲ | dev1ycan 5 hours ago |
| Every subscription's profitability stands on people forgetting to unsubscribe, how is this surprising? |
|
| ▲ | gck1 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| They're in the wrong business then. They're selling peak automation software, with the sales pitch of 'have AI do your work while you sleep'. Are they banning their core offering? Are Ralph' loops also banned for building software? Because I can drain my quota with a simple bash loop faster than any OpenClaw instance. |
| |
| ▲ | harrall 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | You most likely don’t pay per call for your cellphone. You most likely don’t pay per machine to use the gym. You don’t pay per cup if they allow unlimited refills. You are not supposed to go into an all-you-can eat buffet and stuff steaks into your bag. Sometimes not all of us want to do the math à la carte for every thing we use in life. Don’t ruin it for us. | | |
| ▲ | akssassin907 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | The buffet analogy breaks down here. Using OpenClaw isn't stuffing steaks in your bag — you're eating the same food, in the same seat, consuming the same tokens your subscription allows. Google banned you because they didn't like the plate you brought. Then took your house key as punishment. The steaks-in-bag analogy would apply if you were somehow extracting MORE than your quota. You're not. You're just routing the same tokens differently. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | dmix 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| You must not work in the SaaS business if you think that |
| |
| ▲ | jcgrillo 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Not sure if this is sarcasm, but I'll respond as if it isn't. Having worked my entire career to date in the SaaS business, it is well known in some verticals that a large portion of revenue comes from companies that literally do not know they have purchased your product. And when you have a large customer like that, people are very careful to walk quietly and not do anything to notify them. I've seen it happen quite a few times. |
|
