| ▲ | usef- 5 hours ago | |
I don't think that's an apt metaphor. You bought one general water supply, like an API user. If they sold a "no baths" cheaper option I'd be fine with them banning baths to those customers. Google's API does let you use any client. The gemini/antigravity clients are a different (subscription) service. When you reverse engineer the clients and use their internal auth/apis you will typically have very different access patterns to other clients (eg: not using prompt caching), and this is likely showing up in their metrics. This isn't unusual. A bottomless drink at a restaurant has restrictions: it's for you to drink, not to pass around to others at the table (unless they buy one too). You can't pour it into bottles to take large quantities home, etc. And it's priced accordingly: if sharing/bottling was allowed the price would have to increase. | ||
| ▲ | apgwoz 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |
The irony of an ex-Google engineer coining Hyrum’s Law (https://www.hyrumslaw.com/) | ||