| ▲ | atonse 3 hours ago | |||||||
Have you tried Grokipedia yet? Cuz you’ve mainly addressed the concept. But have you read a bunch of articles? Found inaccuracies? Seen the edit process? Cuz, regardless of ideology, the edit process couldn’t have been done before because AI like this didn’t exist before. | ||||||||
| ▲ | bigyabai 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
No, I see no reason to give AI-generated articles a second of my time. Wikipedia's best feature is the human-provided citations; you can very easily validate a claim with a hardlink to a book, article or video archive. AI does not have the skillset or the tools required to match Wikipedia's quality. It can definitely create it's own edit process, but it's a useless one for people like me that don't treat the internet as a ground-truth. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | wat10000 31 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
"As of February 19, 2026, Musk’s net worth is estimated at $844.9 billion per Forbes' Real-Time Billionaires List, primarily derived from equity stakes rather than cash..." That "rather than cash" bit is bizarre, since no wealthy person holds primarily cash. I checked the pages of several other ultra-wealthy people and none of them have that comment. I'm sure this has nothing to do with Grokipedia's owner recently making an issue of how little cash he holds. | ||||||||