| ▲ | ericmay 3 hours ago |
| “Who is left on Facebook besides dopamine junkies and bots?” “I only use it in this limited circumstance” You are on Facebook. That’s who. It’s like saying you’re not a drinker because you have a glass of wine every once in a while. Sure you’re not an addict (probably) but you still drink. |
|
| ▲ | thaumasiotes 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > It’s like saying you’re not a drinker because you have a glass of wine every once in a while. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/20110... > Take a 2002 Times/CNN poll on the eating habits of 10,000 Americans. Six percent of the individuals surveyed said they considered themselves vegetarian. But when asked by the pollsters what they had eaten in the last 24 hours, 60% of the self-described "vegetarians" admitted that [they] had consumed red meat, poultry, or fish the previous day. |
| |
| ▲ | Aurornis 2 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > Six percent of the individuals surveyed said they considered themselves vegetarian In any casual poll like this, every number has a large margin of error. When 6% of respondents select an answer, some of those were mis-clicks, people who misread the answers, or people who were just clicking through randomly. The latter happens a lot when bad UX means the only way to see the results is to take the poll. So the more likely explanation is not that people were calling themselves vegetarian but also eating meat recently, it’s that around half of those reporting vegetarians were either mis-clicks or people blindly clicking things. It happens a lot in online polls. | |
| ▲ | burkaman 9 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I wonder what the breakdown between meat/poultry and fish was. I know it isn't the dictionary definition, but I think the common definition of "vegetarian" in the US includes people who only eat fish. I don't know anyone that uses "pescatarian" in conversation or identifies as that, even if it's accurate. |
|
|
| ▲ | theodric 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I'm happy they've been able to build a $1,660,000,000,000 company on the back of me logging in once every two months, scrolling 3 posts, getting disgusted with slop, and closing the tab. Gives me hope that my harebrained ventures may also succeed! |
| |
| ▲ | airstrike 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I love the unabbreviated $1,660,000,000,000 lol It reminded me of Waxahatchee's > You let me take my own damn car > To Brooklyn, New York, USA | |
| ▲ | ericmay 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't buy it. You use it more than that - otherwise you'd just delete your account. | | |
| ▲ | sylos 27 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | So if someone doesn't use something they must delete instead of letting it rot? | |
| ▲ | morissette 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I’m down to 3 hours a week of social media woot! | | | |
| ▲ | bluGill 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That is about right for me. I scoll a little longer but as soon as it changes from people I care to follow to slop I'm gone for a couple more months. there is value in following distant friends but it isn't worth hours per day of sorting through slop to find it. When it is only every month or two the non-slop still seems to rise to the top. (But God only knows what non slop they choose not to show me) I wish there was a way to block all 'so-and-so shared' as that is where most of the slop comes from. (Ads at least I can say is how they pay the bills and so I accept a few as non-slop) | |
| ▲ | lanfeust6 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I keep mine alive a) to squat on the account for my identity, b) just because I know there are family members that will do posts/messages once in awhile instead of sending me a direct SMS, so I log in every few months | |
| ▲ | carlosjobim 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's for messaging with old people. It's like having a telephone doesn't mean you're talking all day. It's for people to be able to contact you and vice versa. |
|
|
