You can't have it both ways. As a library author choose MIT to encourage commercial usage because companies are afraid of GPL, but then complain that companies are actually using it in a MIT license way without contributing back.

▲

dkersten 36 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I can find it off putting regardless. Especially since I’m not the person who released it under MIT license.

▲

thn-gap 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

License it GPL, and it will be fed to a model as training data to recreate it copyright free anyways.

	▲	orangecoffee 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Training falls outside of copyright concerns because of fair use, so proprietary or free is orthogonal. This is how the world is currently trending.