> The military is unfortunately chock full of functional alcoholics. As long as they don't get caught drunk on the job, seen partying too much, DIU, or admit anything to their doctor, they keep getting renewed their clearance.

Well yeah. If it's not affecting your job then what's it matter? If your a closet alcoholic then sure that's something the Russians could hold over you.

There's millions of people with clearances; that's impossible to staff at below market wages and also above average moral(?) standards.

▲

Aurornis 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> If it's not affecting your job then what's it matter? If your a closet alcoholic then sure that's something the Russians could hold over you

Alcohol lowers inhibitions and alters decision making. Drinking a lot of alcohol more so than casual drinking. Frequently drinking a lot of alcohol has a very high area under the curve of poor decision making.

Functional alcoholism can come with delusions of sobriety where the person believes they’re not too drunk despite being heavily impaired.

So they’ll do things like have a few (or ten) drinks before checking their email. It makes them a better target for everything like fishing attacks, as one example.

It’s not just about enemies holding it against you.

▲

vscode-rest an hour ago | parent [-]

Gross misunderstanding of the threat model.

Phishing is not the problem here. Your laptop isn’t getting SIPR emails with links to fake login screens.

	▲	Aurornis 24 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I think you’re misunderstanding the threat model for why security clearance cares about impaired judgment of your off time, too. There’s more to these people’s lives than when they’re on the clock (figuratively speaking). Getting compromised anywhere is a problem.
	▲	wongarsu an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Being drunk at the bar/club/social event and telling that very interested lady a bit too much is probably the better example Still not as bad as being susceptible to blackmail or bribes