|
| ▲ | samrus 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Thats actively malicious. I understand not going out of your way to catch the LLMs' bugs so as to show the folly of the initiative, but actively sabotaging it is legitimately dangerous behavior. Its acting in bad faith. And i say this as someone who would mostly oppose such an initiative myself I would go so far as to say that you shouldnt be employed in the industry. Malicious actors like you will contribute to an erosion of trust thatll make everything worse |
| |
| ▲ | sp00chy 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Might be but sometimes you don’t have another choice when employers are enforcing AIs which have no „feeling“ for context of all business processes involved created by human workers in the years before. Those who spent a lot of love and energy for them mostly. And who are now forced to work against an inferior but overpowered workforce. Don’t stop sabotaging AI efforts. | |
| ▲ | tovej an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Forcing developers to use unsafe LLM tools is also malicious. This is completely ethical to me. Not commenting on legality. But ethically, this is correct. |
|
|
| ▲ | hypeatei 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That's extremely unethical. You're being paid to do something and you deliberately broke it which not only cost your employer additional time and money, but it also cost your customers time and money. If I were you, I'd probably just quit and find another profession. |
|
| ▲ | renegade-otter 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I see someone is not familiar with the joys of the current job market. |
|
| ▲ | logicchains 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| That's not "sabotaged", that's sabotaged, if you intentionally introduced the bugs. Be very careful admitting something like that publicly unless you're absolutely completely sure nobody could map your HN username to your real identity. |