| ▲ | trcf23 9 hours ago | |||||||
Has anyone find a useful way to to something with Claws without massive security risk? As a n8n user, i still don't understand the business value it adds beyond being exciting... Any resources or blog post to share on that? | ||||||||
| ▲ | embedding-shape 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> Has anyone find a useful way to to something with Claws without massive security risk? Not really, no. I guess the amount of integrations is what people are raving about or something? I think one of the first thing I did when I got access to codex, was to write a harness that lets me fire off jobs via a webui on a remote access, and made it possible for codex to edit and restart it's own process, and send notifications via Telegram. Was a fun experiment, still use it from time to time, but it's not a working environment, just a fun prototype. I gave openclaw a try some days ago, and besides that the setup wrote config files that had syntax errors, it couldn't run in a local container and the terminology is really confusing ("lan-only mode" really means "bind to all found interfaces" for some stupid reason), the only "benefit" I could see would be the big amount of integrations it comes with by default. But it seems like such a vibeslopped approach, as there is a errors and nonsense all over the UI and implementation, that I don't think it'll manageable even in the short-term, it seems to already have fallen over it's own spaghetti architecture. I'm kind of shocked OpenAI hired the person behind it, but they also probably see something we from the outside cannot even see, as they surely weren't hired because of how openclaw was implemented. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | mikert89 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
once the models get smart enough, you wont need n8n, they will just do the workflow without it needing to be specified. this is coming pretty soon | ||||||||
| ||||||||