| ▲ | password54321 3 hours ago |
| >He knows what he's talking about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority |
|
| ▲ | onion2k 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| While I appreciate an appeal to authority is a logical fallacy, you can't really use that to ignore everyone's experience and expertise. Sometimes people who have a huge amount of experience and knowledge on a subject do actually make a valid point, and their authority on the subject is enough to make them worth listening to. |
| |
| ▲ | avaer 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | But we're talking about authority of naming things being justified by a tech resume. It's as irrelevant as George Foreman naming the grill. | | |
| ▲ | onion2k 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Naming things in the context of AI, by someone who is already responsible for naming other things in the context of AI, when they have a lot of valid experience in the field of AI. It's not entirely unreasonable. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | wepple 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy |
| |
| ▲ | password54321 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Not claiming anything to be false, just a reminder that you should question ones opinion a bit more and not claim they "know what they are talking about" because they worked with Fei-Fei Li. You are outsourcing your thinking to someone else which is lazy and a good way of getting conned. What even happened to https://eurekalabs.ai/? | |
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [deleted] |
