Hmm. This is celebrated as a victory - I don't mind that, who likes the crazy pro-russian orange man anyway. But I think it should be pointed out that he went on to use an old law. So the supreme court basically said that this was an unfit use case. Ok. They could just come up with a new law that is tailor-made and may eventually be approved. It may take some time but they could technically do so, right? So I am not sure if that victory dance isn't just too early.

▲

rsynnott an hour ago | parent | next [-]

> They could just come up with a new law that is tailor-made and may eventually be approved.

Allowing Trump to trash the US economy is one thing, but even a Republican congress may be a little unwilling to actively _do it themselves_. Trump won't last forever, and they need to get re-elected.

▲

Ronje 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You do realize these tariffs aren't going away. They just used a different legal way to use them. Section 232, 301, 201, 122 and 338 will allow him put these right back on

	▲	UltraSane 9 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Those are more limited in duration and percentage.
	▲	Tadpole9181 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		They still have to pay back all the money collected. And those other tariff avenues have different restrictions, like maximum amounts or limited durations.