| ▲ | retired 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Good thing restricting side-loading isn't legal in the European Union! Not a problem here. Apple had to enable side-loading on their EU-based phones and so will Google if they restrict it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | post-it 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes it is, and no they didn't. Apple has to allow (heavily restricted) alternative app stores, and I'm not clear on whether any actually exist right now. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | sepositus 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
How specific is the law? What if side loading requires a "trusted" signed certificate where trusted means from Google Play? Not even playing devil's advocate, just wondering how many loopholes actually exist. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Pxtl 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
If a lawsuit tackles this problem in the EU, will we finally also see somebody go after MS for their obnoxious code signing certificates? While MS code signing certs are more circumventable for power-users than Android's new approved developer program, their pricing is far more prohibitive for independent OSS developers and hobbyists, costing hundreds of USD per year. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | lern_too_spel 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The kind of "side-loading" of notarized apps outside the manufacturer's app store that Apple allows in the EU is exactly what Google proposed to do for all its Android builds. We don't want that. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||